|
| |
|
|
Russian military deception during the annexation of Crimea
Lutsenko, Oleksandr ; Šír, Jan (advisor) ; Svoboda, Karel (referee)
The work aims to identify the use of specific maskirovka methods during the Russian military operation in the Crimea and subsequently to evaluate their impact on the overall operation. In the analysis, special emphasis will be positioned on disinformation and deceptive campaigns, which formed the bulk of the military operation. The work is conceived as a case study of Russian military operation on the annexation of Crimea in 2014. The author chose the concept of military deception (theory), which will be used to analyze the progress of units on the peninsula (a specific case). In the context of the impact of tactics and maskirovka methods on the overall military operation, the thesis after analysis concluded that such methods have become fundamentally crucial in the invasion of Russian military units in Crimea. The maskirovka aims to influence the enemy's decision-making process, which was fully achieved during the Crimean operation.
|
|
|
Russian military deception during the annexation of Crimea
Lutsenko, Oleksandr ; Šír, Jan (advisor) ; Svoboda, Karel (referee)
The work aims to identify the use of specific maskirovka methods during the Russian military operation in the Crimea and subsequently to evaluate their impact on the overall operation. In the analysis, special emphasis will be positioned on disinformation and deceptive campaigns, which formed the bulk of the military operation. The work is conceived as a case study of Russian military operation on the annexation of Crimea in 2014. The author chose the concept of military deception (theory), which will be used to analyze the progress of units on the peninsula (a specific case). In the context of the impact of tactics and maskirovka methods on the overall military operation, the thesis after analysis concluded that such methods have become fundamentally crucial in the invasion of Russian military units in Crimea. The maskirovka aims to influence the enemy's decision-making process, which was fully achieved during the Crimean operation.
|
|
|
Germany's attitude to development of Ukraine crisis during years 2013-2014
Boubelík, Tomáš ; Eichler, Jan (advisor) ; Dubský, Zbyněk (referee)
This work engages in circumstances related to escalation of the conflict in Ukraine. It tries to justify Germany's evident efforts to calm the situation down. In introduction it provides theoretical basis by defining actor and interdependence theory, which are subsequently applied to Germany's and Ukraine's position in the field of international relations. Term interdependence is explained in accordance with economic relations between Germany and Russia. Second part of this work is focused on German foreign policy since its shaping, institutional background to implementation within the European Union. In the third part, that could be considered as core of bachelor thesis, are chronological described events and attitudes of leading German politicians to violations of international law by Russia. The final chapter analyses German's diplomacy participation on negotiation process, establishment and enforcement of Minsk agreements.
|
|
|
Economic cooperation between Russia and Ukraine
Matyásková, Kateřina ; Jiránková, Martina (advisor) ; Musiyenko, Svitlana (referee)
The bachelor thesis deals with economic cooperation between Russia and Ukraine. The economic development of both countries since the disintregation of the Soviet Union up to the present day is teoretically defined in the first chapter. In the second chapter international trade in these two countries is being evaluated. An emphasis is put on territorial infrastructure, commodity structure and direct foreign investment. The third, final chapter deals with the Crimea problem and thus the conflict in the eastern Ukraine. The last subhead evaluates the posibility of future economic growth in Ukraine.
|
|
|
Propaganda v mezinárodních vztazích: Případová studie rusko-ukrajinského konfliktu
Kadlecová, Veronika ; Kratochvíl, Petr (advisor) ; Cibulková, Petra (referee)
The thesis identifies and further examines the role of propaganda in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, more specifically in the period around the annexation of the Crimean peninsula by the Russian Federation in March 2014. Critical discourse analysis is employed in order to analyse selected speeches of the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, and the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, relevant to the topic and in the period under investigation. The first chapter introduces a theoretical framework on propaganda in international relations, its definition, history and research. The methodology is described in detail in the second chapter. The historical context of the conflict is provided at the beginning of the empirical part of the thesis closely followed by a detailed analysis of the selected speeches. The findings support the prediction that there is a presence of propaganda identified within the speeches of both political leaders, thus in the conflict itself, and offer valuable insights into the hidden meanings and possible motives behind its use. The study advances our understanding of the phenomenon and helps us to expose and confront propaganda further.
|
guest ::
